 |
| Posted: Mon Nov 2nd, 2009 11:17 pm |
|
1st Post |
| Posted: Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 12:29 am |
|
2nd Post |
Herb Kephart
Administrator
|
Ralph
Probably even rarer in the US than in OZ
But certainly a question that Pilotfriend can answer
Herb
____________________
I get along very well with other people, as long as they leave me the @#*& alone!
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 07:03 am |
|
3rd Post |
pilotfriend
| Joined: | Fri Oct 2nd, 2009 |
| Location: | Iraq |
| Posts: | 227 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
To an extent, the choice is a matter of taste. As the gauge gets smaller, the harder it gets to ensure proper register and a sector plate become better as at least one end is tied down.
The downside to both systems if one is using an end to end layout is that the trains will need to be reversed. Some folks build a cassette system into their traversers so the entire train can be picked up as one.
Shown below is a traverser built for my layout which was used until all the modules were complete and a rear fiddle yard installed. It worked quite will but our 9mm gauge asked a lot of it.
Here are some links that may be helpful
http://mrc.murky.net/tech1.shtml
http://rail.felgall.com/fyd.htm
http://www.stationroadbaseboards.co.uk/menu_fittings.htm
hope this helps
best
John
Last edited on Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 07:48 am by pilotfriend
|
|
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 3rd, 2009 09:26 pm |
|
4th Post |
| Posted: Fri Nov 6th, 2009 10:30 pm |
|
5th Post |
Paladin
Administrator
| Joined: | Tue Jan 24th, 2006 |
| Location: | Berwick, Australia |
| Posts: | 2404 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Ralph:-
Anymore thoughts on this matter.
Don
____________________
Don McL
|
|
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 9th, 2009 08:45 pm |
|
6th Post |
lostinoz
|
Sorry Don.
I am still messing about with track plans, But I still need all the help I can get.
 Ralph (lostinoz)
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 13th, 2011 06:09 am |
|
7th Post |
gndboy
|
I think the sector plate is really useful functioning as the "missing end" of a runaround, or loop. It's also useful to provide routing to a fiddle located behind a backdrop. A traverser can have multiple tracks and so provide for some car holding and more complex "off-the-layout" operating schemes at the expense of some real estate and construction effort. As always, there are many terrific examples on Carl Arendt's wonderful 'site. The layout design may naturally favor one over the other. Have fun!
Ric
____________________
If it moves, tax it. If it still moves, regulate it. When it stops moving, subsidize it.
|
|
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17th, 2011 09:24 pm |
|
8th Post |
Toeffelholm
| Joined: | Sun Sep 21st, 2008 |
| Location: | Germany |
| Posts: | 309 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Hi,
for my Gn15 module layout (1:22.5 scale on 16.5mm track) I have planned two fiddle yards as sector plate for the whole train. Here's my plan
JuergenLast edited on Sat Sep 17th, 2011 09:39 pm by Toeffelholm
____________________
modelling in 1:22.5 on 32mm and 16.5mm track
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 18th, 2011 12:53 am |
|
9th Post |
pipopak
| Joined: | Wed Apr 13th, 2011 |
| Location: | Florida USA |
| Posts: | 385 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
|
Decades ago I made a traverser, HO standard gauge, about 4' long and 6 parallel tracks. Later will post the lurid details.
____________________
No matter how bad things are now, they can (and will) go worse.
Mr Murphy.
|
|
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 18th, 2011 02:34 pm |
|
10th Post |
Herb Kephart
Administrator
|
I think that Juergen's idea is the best solution--if there is room for it--as it gives the ability to reverse the train for the return trip--something that sectors or traversers do not permit.
Herb 
____________________
I get along very well with other people, as long as they leave me the @#*& alone!
|
|
|
Current time is 09:50 pm | Page: 1 2   |
|
|
|
