Freerails Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Freerails > Model Railroad Forums > Photography > Old-School photo techniques in a digital world?

Because of non-railroad abuse of the site, new members MUST use their first names (at least) to join NO EXCEPTIONS!

Old-School photo techniques in a digital world?
 Moderated by: pipopak
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
 Rate Topic 
AuthorPost
 Posted: Tue Mar 28th, 2017 10:07 pm
  PMQuoteReply
1st Post
Lee B
Registered


Joined: Tue Dec 9th, 2014
Location: The Pacific NW, By Way Of The Deep South, USA
Posts: 640
Status: 
Offline
I’m just curious if anyone thinks there’s anything to be learned from the era of large-format negatives or 35MM in regard to model photography.
After my layout became what I refer to as, “photo worthy” I went back and read several of the old magazine and book passages on model train photography. Lacking a darkroom and realizing that a lot of digital manipulation of photos can look, well, terrible (putting real loco smoke into a photo with the lighting totally off, can look laughable).
Taking some of these old techniques, I think I got some good effects. Some of the other shots I took around the same time as these will be in the new On30 Annual which should be out next month.
I’m hardly saying my work is any better than anyone else’s, but I have raised some eyebrows with the local modelers when I told them I used no software at all on these shots other than to crop them.
Most were taken in 30+ second exposures and the ‘smoke’ and ‘steam' were formed structures of paper, foam or cotton, moved under the long exposures and removed for a translucent look. Note also they cast shadows, unlike photoshop.
My point is, we can learn a lot from the old heads when it comes to photography!























Last edited on Wed Mar 29th, 2017 01:22 am by Lee B



____________________
-Lee

http://www.freewebs.com/willysmb44/modeltrains.htm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/53587910@N05/sets/72157668176638961
Back To Top

 Posted: Tue Mar 28th, 2017 11:36 pm
  PMQuoteReply
2nd Post
Kitbash0n30
Registered


Joined: Mon Dec 10th, 2012
Location: Boonville, Missouri USA
Posts: 561
Status: 
Offline
Semi-random oblique commentary:

"CGI doesn’t always work and it should be used very carefully, or else you risk entering dangerous territory."
"Let’s take a look at some filmmakers who decided to pull off some extraordinary special effects without the use of CGI."
http://www.raindance.org/7-practical-effects-in-films-you-probably-thought-were-cgi/

"But is it an issue? Is it valid even to ask the question at all? Isn’t it time we rejected all that “either/or” nonsense and concentrated on simply getting the job done in the best possible way?
There’s only one way to get a decent answer: ask the experts. So that’s what I’ve done. I put my question to a group of top professionals from the field of practical effects, left them to ponder … and then stood well back.
You want to know what the future holds for practical creature effects? You’re about to find out."
http://cinefex.com/blog/practical-creature-effects/

"There is no objectively correct position to the debate about visual effects versus practical effects in modern filmmaking. Each side has its advantages and potential pitfalls, whether they are more efficient, economical or commercial. To critics the ultimate valuation of one process over the other is their successful integration into the completed film as seen by audiences. If the final result is convincing how it got to the screen is largely irrelevant. "
https://medium.com/cinenation-show/a-balancing-act-practical-effects-and-visual-effects-96f29f26527a



____________________
See y'all later, Forrest.
Screw the rivets, I'm building for atmosphere
Back To Top


 Current time is 03:18 am

Freerails > Model Railroad Forums > Photography > Old-School photo techniques in a digital world?
Top



UltraBB 1.172 Copyright © 2007-2016 Data 1 Systems