Freerails Home 
Home Search search Menu menu Not logged in - Login | Register
Freerails > Model Railroad Forums > Track Planning > Expanding The 'Yellow Creek Western' - On30

Freerails IS ACCEPTING new Members ... To join Freerails ... See how to Register as a Member in the 'Joining Freerails' Forum

Expanding The 'Yellow Creek Western' - On30
 Moderated by: Herb Kephart Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page  
New Topic Reply Printer Friendly
 Rating:  Rating
AuthorPost
 Posted: Sat Sep 29th, 2018 11:31 pm
  PMQuoteReply
1st Post
Tom Harbin
Registered
 

Joined: Sat Sep 1st, 2018
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline
I accidentally highjacked Kyle's thread on his On30 track plan. 
Rather than continue to highjack his thread, I am starting a new thread for my railroad, currently called the Yellow Creek Western.

If you would like more information on it, I have a blog at trainblog.tharbin.com. 
I'm just going to add enough here to give a little background information on what currently exists and where I would like to take the layout. 
I will break this into two posts. The first (this one) will give the background and the second will be the redesign. 

I am hoping to get some feedback like Lee B and KitbashOn30 started to give me on Kyle's thread.

The original layout was called the Summit Ridge Railroad after the name that was on the station. 

It was not designed to be an actual layout but rather part of a Christmas Village display in our living room during the Christmas season.

The layout is roughly 3.5 x 6.5 feet. 
Rather than a simple oval of track, I added a few sidings. 
The idea was that I could switch between a passenger train and a freight train by moving one or the other to a siding,
and to have a few places to park other cars to make it look more like a railroad.

The layout was built on a 1" slab of pink foam and I used some WS 2% risers to add some grades. 
The layout was supposed to be stored most of the year so it was kept fairly thin and light. 
Originally the track was Bachmann EZ track just laid on the board.

The original track plan:






That was quickly changed but I never made a track plan. 
Basically, added some of Bachmann's filler pieces to enlarge the loop, turn it a little more toward the "staging yard" and straightened out the inside siding.

Before I finished the initial landscaping I pulled off the EZ track and ordered some ME On30 code 83 flex and switches. 
I just did not like the look of the HO track and it was obnoxiously loud. 
The sectional look also made it too toy-like for my tastes.

The ME track installed easily. 
I should probably add at this point that other than an N Scale sectional layout-on-a-door built 30 years ago, this was my first layout.

This is a rough approximation of the final trackplan. 
Note that this was done after the fact in AnyRail so it is not exact. 
The trackplan was actually devised real time by fitting flex into the scenery utilizing the areas and ramps from the Bachmann track.







Since this topic area is about layout planning I should add the minimum radius is 15
(except for one tiny spot that is about 14 and 7/8 just to annoy me) 
and the switches are all #5 with servos under layout.

This was how the Christmas Village looked two days before Christmas. 
Much left to be done but...







Since then, I went back and painted/ballasted the track, did more SculptaMoulding, added ground cover etc.

I will follow up with another post that explains where the layout is today and where I would like to take it.

Thanks,

Tom



Back To Top

 Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 01:10 am
  PMQuoteReply
2nd Post
Tom Harbin
Registered
 

Joined: Sat Sep 1st, 2018
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline
Continued...


The layout was moved to my office after Christmas and never left again. Just too lazy to move it back to the living room. 
After reading many posts about the problems with snow scenes (yellowing, dust and dirt, etc.) we decided to make it Christmas season but not snow covered. 
I puttered at the layout for several years in tiny dibs and drabs probably only a few hours per year and ran it occasionally--and all of the Christmas season.

I eventually added a freight station that was a Rusty Stumps laser kit but I never finished it.

The layout looked like this just before things changed:







The reason I took the photo above was because a friend gave me 2 dozen trees, a 0-4-2 Porter, a Davenport, another Zephyr and 18 pieces of ME On30 code 83 track.

I decided it was time for a change. 
The two spurs that acted as staging were too short, even a few inches longer would have greatly increased their usefulness.  
Their is no passing siding, no escape tracks no way to turn an engine let alone train etc.
This was, and still is, a display layout.

First thing was I decided to move the freight station to the end of the staging area and extend the tracks. 
Then move a depot back to the end of the long inside spur.







My wife mentioned that she liked my building more than the ceramic ones and maybe I should replace the buildings with my own.

5 minutes later:







I needed to add some foam for the new freight station location anyway so I decided to enlarge the layout. 
I built two 8 foot L girders and attached them to the desk frame I was using and moved the layout to one end. 
My first thought was a reverse loop.







It did not take me long to decide it was worse than no reverse loop, at least as configured. 
I also figured out that the height, while fine for a living room display, was too short for a layout. 
I added 1x6 crossbeams to elevate it more and to give me someplace to hang stuff.







I have found out that I enjoy building someone-else's-designed buildings quite a bit, 
so I'm currently playing with building placement and realigning the "street" to handle more normal-sized O scale buildings.







So why am I writing this? 
Well I don't really want to throw this layout away just yet. 
I'm learning a lot from tinkering with it and it has some emotional attachment as well.

I would though like to fix it though and hopefully add a little more than chasing its tail to the layout before I retire it. 
I'd rather not mess with the back half if I can avoid it because getting those switches in where I could actually use the spurs was not easy. 
I played with it quite a few times to get something that worked. 
I will pull up at least the one section of the loop just in front of the small rock between it and the staging spur. 
It is the under-radius spot.

Since I am pulling that up I could pull up the front switch as well. 
I have already pulled up the staging tracks back to the switch and I will pull up the switch. 
I am going to, will attempt to, build FastTrack #4s in the staging area.

While I would love a larger loop (I like the train running while I'm working fairly often so I need a continuous run) I don't see an easy way to do it. 
I am considering just adding an engine terminal in the currently unplanned area.

The short inside spur is currently thought to be a team track and the long one a passenger depot.

Thoughts, suggestions (other than start over)?

Tom



Back To Top

 Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 03:48 am
  PMQuoteReply
3rd Post
Si.
Moderator


Joined: Thu Feb 23rd, 2012
Location: London
Posts: 4697
Status: 
Offline
Hi Tom  :wave:



AWESOME story & photos covering the 'history' of your railroad !  :thumb:



I really enjoyed reading the story ...

... just the kinda thing I like about Freerails ... 'Reality Railroading' !  ;)



I always admire the 'pioneering spirit' of the adventurous 'build & extend' kinda 'track non-plan'.  :cool:

I think it can work very well & it looks like yours is a good example of that.



What to do next ?  ???
I'll leave ideas about that to the top brains of the Forum !  :brill:

But I might have an idea or two  .   .    .      L:



:moose: :moose: :moose: :moose: :moose:




Si.




____________________

' Mysterious Moose Mountain ' - 1:35n2 - pt.II
http://www.freerails.com/view_topic.php?id=7318&forum_id=17&page=1

' M:R:W Motor Speedway !!! ' - 1:32 Slotcar Racing Layout
http://www.slotforum.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=59295&st=0&a
Back To Top

 Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 03:52 am
  PMQuoteReply
4th Post
Kyle Moore
Registered


Joined: Sat Sep 22nd, 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 31
Status: 
Offline
I thought the conversation in my thread was very interesting though :2t:


It looks like a great small setup, if you were looking to do more I would probably try to use the yard (not sure if it is called that) as an area to extend into a larger space. 

I was thinking like a small 4 inch shelf to run around the room and when you are transporting the layout a way to disconnect the layout from the run around. 

That could also add some space for larger trains as well.




____________________
Innovation is the key
Back To Top

 Posted: Sun Sep 30th, 2018 06:06 am
  PMQuoteReply
5th Post
Tom Harbin
Registered
 

Joined: Sat Sep 1st, 2018
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline
Kyle,

My wife likes that idea also. 
I can't see a way to make it work in the room I'm currently using however. 

Here is an attempt to show the room:







The green area is the current layout and the yellow area is the currently proposed expansion area. 
The wall that the layout is on is 9'11" long. 
The window goes from about 3' up to about 7'. 
Since it is a south facing wall, the window gets a little warm in the summer so for 9 months of the year I have an insulated curtain that covers it. 
There is also a full slat-fin shade in the window casing that is normally closed. 
Things do not last long exposed directly to the window, even with the shade closed.
There is also a walk in closet door that I forgot to show on the longer of the two short walls opposite the window wall. 
That closet door stays open all of the time to help cool the equipment in it (computers).

For additional information, the largest loco that will run is a Bachmann inside frame 4-4-0. 
I have relegated the Mogul and the 36' passenger cars to a display shelf. 
The coaches will be 22' Mount Blue coaches (one already built). 
I still have the 18' Bachmann freight cars but they have been removed and will be replaced with 14' Chiver's Fineline cars and possibly a few 12' and 14' Silver City cars.
Since both the the passenger and freight cars are close to a scale 6' width, I may use On2 track spacing instead of On30.

The time frame I'm aiming for is the late 1800s, probably around 1880-1885.

Thanks for the input, it is an appealing idea. 
I may move to another room that would allow at least an L-shape but I want to see what I can do with this space before I give up and move.

Tom 

Back To Top

 Posted: Mon Oct 1st, 2018 06:48 pm
  PMQuoteReply
6th Post
Michael M
Registered


Joined: Thu Jan 26th, 2017
Location: San Bernardino, California USA
Posts: 996
Status: 
Offline
Tom,

Careful with the track spacing.  

You may need room to get your fingers in there to re-rail cars or for uncoupling.  

I keep a minimum spacing of 3.5" on parallel tracks on my 35n2 layout, but a little more is better.





____________________
Michael
-------
Nye, Inyo & Esmeralda Railroad
Back To Top

 Posted: Tue Oct 2nd, 2018 09:28 pm
  PMQuoteReply
7th Post
Tom Harbin
Registered
 

Joined: Sat Sep 1st, 2018
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline
Michael,

That is a very good point. 
Right now there is little switching going on as the "layout" wasn't really designed for operation (not sure I could have done a decent operations layout anyway). 
Also the two spurs in the "staging area" are torn up for now.

When I do switching moves I use a RIX decoupler but there is always the odd (Oh #!##!).

The layout is so small that I try to economize everywhere I can. 
I am even switching to shorter cars to make it look bigger.

To make it worse, I am seriously considering switching to Link and Pin couplers.

Thanks

Tom

Back To Top

 Posted: Tue Oct 2nd, 2018 11:31 pm
  PMQuoteReply
8th Post
Lee B
Registered


Joined: Tue Dec 9th, 2014
Location: The Pacific NW, By Way Of The Deep South, USA
Posts: 933
Status: 
Offline
Tom Harbin wrote: I am hoping to get some feedback like Lee B and KitbashOn30 started to give me on Kyle's thread.





Careful what you wish for!
Seriously, the two spurs at the upper right, I'd put them together at the end with a turnout and just enough track for a loco to 'escape' from a head-in switching move.
I'd also not have the interior spurs end so close to the mainlines. 
Trust me, they look odd when you do that (I cut a spur on my own layout back quite a bit after doing so before the scenery went in).
You could also run a one-car spur to the mainline where it curves at the upper left, for operating potential 
(with a ramp for flat cars or along the side of the track for side loading for a boxcar).




____________________
-Lee

http://www.freewebs.com/willysmb44/modeltrains.htm
https://www.flickr.com/photos/53587910@N05/sets/72157668176638961
Back To Top

 Posted: Wed Oct 3rd, 2018 12:04 am
  PMQuoteReply
9th Post
Kitbash0n30
Registered


Joined: Mon Dec 10th, 2012
Location: Boonville, Missouri USA
Posts: 685
Status: 
Offline
Tom Harbin wrote: The layout is so small that I try to economize everywhere I can. I am even switching to shorter cars to make it look bigger.

That makes sense.

Don't have an On30 layout at home right now, 
but I built new bodies for some Bachmann HO 4-wheel cars in Thomas the Tank Engine range when some came available at close to half price.

Also used some  HO scale 36ft old timer, and Athearn 40ft, car frames. 
Well, dang, don't seem to have ever put any decent images of them up on Flickr.
Had a number on P-bucket until that day when ...

Okay, cars in background here will give the idea,






Another advantage of really short cars is that there is minimal coupler displacement from track centerline on really sharp curves.








____________________
See y'all later, Forrest.
Screw the rivets, I'm building for atmosphere
Back To Top

 Posted: Wed Oct 3rd, 2018 12:23 am
  PMQuoteReply
10th Post
Tom Harbin
Registered
 

Joined: Sat Sep 1st, 2018
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 66
Status: 
Offline

Lee,

Do you mean the two spurs at the upper left?

I was going to change that to three spurs that are just a little longer. 
If you look at the last photo of my second post I have an overlay of what I was planning to do. 
The overlay just uses Bachmann track sections since I didn't have FastTracks #4 pieces in AnyRail.

I understand what you mean about the escape track. 
I'll see what I can do. 
The reason they stop short of the back of the layout is that I plan on having a creek wind around from behind the spurs to the left of the freight station.

I agree on the other spurs being too close to the mainline. 
The short one looks better now that it is a team track but still not great. 
The long spur to the depot looks dumb. 
I have a small extension of the "mountain" that is at the end that helps and I may make it taller when I convert the "mountain" into part of the cut, 
but cutting it back some would probably be a good idea.

I need to think about your last suggestion a little. 
I don't have a lot of room for my buildings as it is but another spur of the mainline would be good.

Tom

Back To Top


 Current time is 12:43 am
Page:    1  2  3  4  5  6  Next Page Last Page  

Freerails > Model Railroad Forums > Track Planning > Expanding The 'Yellow Creek Western' - On30
Top



UltraBB 1.172 Copyright © 2007-2016 Data 1 Systems